2.2 Screen Loudspeakers
2.2.1 Location
The Left and Right
screen loudspeakers should be mounted at the left and right extremes of the
screen width when the masking is fully opened for projection of a 2.35:1
(Cinemascope) aspect ratio anamorphic picture. If screen masking covers these
loudspeakers when a 1.85:1 picture is being projected, high-frequency
attenuation due to the screen masking should not exceed 2dB at 8kHz.
The obvious intention of many elements in a stereo sound-track
is that a sound should seem to emanate from the same location as the related
picture image. When an actor closes a door at the left of the picture, the
sound of the closing door should come from the same location; when we see a
trumpet player close to the right edge of the screen, the sound should come
from the same side of the screen. The objective of stereo sound is to place the
apparent sound source sufficiently close to the image of the trumpet, in a way
such that sound and picture together seem "real".
Listening to music in the home places no specific demands that
stereo width be accurately defined -- there is no picture to which the sound
should match. Typically, though, the two loudspeakers will subtend a total
included angle of around 60 degrees to the listener. In the home the distances
from the loudspeakers are short, and the room surfaces (furnishings) are
absorbent -- as a result the listener will hear dominantly the direct signal
from the loudspeakers.
In a commercial theatre, however -- no matter how small, and
no matter how absorbent the materials on the walls and ceiling -- the path
lengths are so much greater that what most of the audience hears with
non-transient material is dominantly reverberant information coming from many
directions, reflected from many room surfaces. This is why with a typical
theatre layout, measurements show that at best only in the first row or two of
seats does the near-field direct signal dominate.
As a result, from a prime seat where the screen subtends an
ideal projection angle of 45 degrees, the listener may hear an acoustic width
of only 25 or 30 degrees from loudspeakers typically 40 degrees apart, mounted
at the screen ends. Further back, dominance of the reverberant field increases,
and acoustic width therefore narrows still more. Indeed, in the back rows of
most theatres, so much directional information is lost and the sound becomes so
diffuse that few, if any, spot effects can be directly associated with the
action on the screen.
This progressive attenuation of stereo width towards the rear
of the house explains the requirement for maximum possible width in loudspeaker
placement. As films are mixed to match picture in the dubbing theatre, it is
difficult to conceive of situations where the screen is so large, and the
reverberation so short, that the sound image is too wide for any of the
audience not sitting in the front one-or-two rows.
This requirement for maximum stereo width holds equally true
with the narrower screen image of a 1.85:1 movie, and to the maximum width of a
2.35:1 anamorphic print. Even though the masking has moved in to sharp-matte
the 20% narrower picture image, the widest possible audio image should be
retained -- in this way, the sound/picture match will "work" for the largest
possible percentage of the audience.
Some years ago, narrowing the masking and covering the left
and right loudspeakers when projecting a 1.85:1 picture caused major audio
problems. (Not surprisingly, when considering the high-frequency attenuation
resulting from black felt!) Happily, new techniques and materials have been
developed to answer the problem. Black muslin, or acoustically-transparent,
loudspeaker grille cloth (as used for highfidelity loudspeakers) stretched over
an "open" frame can be used for an insert covering the small area of the
masking obscuring the highfrequency horns. For new theatres, masking cloth
(Harkness 2000M) has been developed which appears matte black, is acoustically
virtually transparent and is only slightly more expensive than the black felt
it makes obsolete. (1)
But even if acoustically transparent masking cloth is used,
care should be taken that the hard mounting edge (typically plywood) which
supports the cloth does not cover any part of the horn mouth. Care should also
be taken that cloth folded back on itself at the mounting edge does not
attenuate the high-frequencies, and that "bunching" masking cloth in front of a
loudspeaker can cause severe highfrequency attenuation.
2.2.3 Loudspeaker Walls
Since the earliest
days of loudspeaker design, it has been recognised that low-frequency response
can be assisted by mounting the transducer in a plane baffle, An infinite sized
baffle puts the transducer in what is termed a 2 pi space. This better bass
efficiency is why the classic cinema loudspeaker for many years, the Altec A4,
was provided with "wings", plane wooden sheets mounted on either side of the LF
unit. This concept was extended in the late seventies, when three or five A4
units would be connected with a wooden frame with a solid plane baffle
connecting each unit. A similar idea was used by Tomlinson Holman with the THX
loudspeaker system (2), where the loudspeaker system is mounted in a
wall, covered with sound absorbent material. This baffle gets close to the
theoretically perfect 2 pi baffle, but if the wall extends from floor to
ceiling it can also effectively cancel transmission of rear screen echoes, as
discussed later.